Congenital heart disease screening recommended for newborns
Los Angeles Times
A federal advisory panel proposes nationwide screening for critical congenital heart disease using pulse oximetry, a simple, pain-free test to measure oxygen in the blood.
Before newborns leave the hospital, they should receive a simple,
pain-free test to check for signs of congenital heart disease,
one of the most common types of birth defects, according to a
recommendation by a federal advisory panel.
In a report published online Sunday [August 21, 2011] in the
journal Pediatrics, the doctors propose nationwide screening for
critical congenital heart disease using pulse oximetry, a probe
placed on a hand and a foot that uses a light source and sensor
to measure oxygen in the blood. Low oxygen levels signal the need
for further testing to look for a heart-related problem.
Although questions remain about the optimal way to implement the
screening, the issue has been pushed onto thenational stage by
parent groups that favor it. In addition, some states — which
have jurisdiction over newborn screenings — have acted on their
own to implement programs. New Jersey and Maryland recently
passed laws requiring pulse oximetry screening, and similar bills
are being considered in other states.
Congenital heart disease involves defects of the walls, valves,
arteries or veins of the heart and occurs in seven to nine of
every 1,000 live births in the United States. About a quarter of
those babies have a critical illness, said Dr. Alex Kemper, an
associate professor of pediatrics at Duke University and the lead
author of the report.
“Those defects are the ones that really require intervention
early in life,” he said. “The challenge is that a baby can be
born with one of these heart defects and look totally normal in
the nursery. But if you can fix these kids before they get really
sick, they have better outcomes.”
Many cases of critical congenital heart disease involve a blood
vessel called the ductus arteriosus. This vessel bypasses the
baby’s lungs when in utero and closes shortly after birth. But in
some cases, it remains open. If undiagnosed, the condition can
cause organ damage or death. The condition and other types of
critical congenital heart defects can be treated with medication
or surgery.
“Over the last three decades, we’ve had incredible advances in
treatment,” said Dr. Gerard Martin, co-director of the Children’s
National Heart Institute in Washington, which has pioneered the
use of newborn pulse oximetry screening. “This is a disease we
can do something about. The problem is not all babies are
identified.”
Studies show about 1 in 6 babies who die from critical congenital
heart disease are undiagnosed, and unrecognized cases are thought
to cause about 200 infant deaths each year, he said. An estimated
2,000 babies a year could be diagnosed sooner if pulse oximetry
were routinely used.
The downside of pulse oximetry screening is that, while clearly
useful in detecting the disease, it can also lead to false
positive results that are costly and stressful for a family. But
several large studies in Europe, including a study of more than
20,000 newborns in Britain published this month in the medical
journal Lancet, showed that pulse oximetry had a high rate of
detection when added to standard exams and a false positive rate
of about 1 in 3,000 cases, Martin said.
“Hospitals that use pulse oximetry in addition to a physical exam
can increase their detection of these babies tenfold,” Martin
said. “There will be some babies potentially missed. But what the
European studies showed is the babies who had false positives had
other problems that required detection and treatment.”
However, false positives are of concern because smaller hospitals
may not have the means to conduct more sophisticated cardiac
testing, thus requiring the transfer of some babies for
additional tests that may prove to be unnecessary.
“False positives are particularly bad because not all hospitals
or nurseries will have access to pediatric echocardiograms or
pediatric cardiologists,” Kemper said. “We want to minimize
unnecessary tests.”
The new report, which was endorsed by the American Academy of
Pediatrics, the American College of Cardiology Foundation and the
American Heart Assn., is now in the hands of Health and Human
Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius. The panel suggests a
screening protocol that combines pulse oximetry with the usual
physical examination, the authors said. To maximize the accuracy
of the results, the report recommends screening newborns in the
second day of life instead of 12 hours after birth, a method
tested in some studies.
The report also recommends cutoffs for what is considered low
oxygen saturation. However, those numbers may not translate well
to regions in which high altitude naturally lowers oxygen
saturation, the report said.
Moreover, hospital nurseries that adopt the recommendations will
need to purchase screening equipment and create a system to test
babies and refer those who need further evaluation. Some
hospitals have already adopted pulse oximetry. But others will
probably wait for recommendations from state newborn screening
programs, Martin said.
